Today's news stripped of bias is brought to you by Curated Effects

Just the facts.

Follow @NPReport
CNN - politics

Jack Smith says Clarence Thomas’ attack on his appointment should not factor into classified documents case


AI Analysis:
Here is the analysis:

**Undisputable Facts:**

* Special Counsel Jack Smith filed a brief with the judge in the classified documents case against former President Donald Trump
* Smith told the judge that Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas' criticism of his appointment should have no bearing on the criminal case against Trump
* The Supreme Court had previously issued an immunity ruling in another case related to Trump's case, and Thomas wrote a concurrence that was not joined by other justices
* Trump's lawyers brought this ruling and Thomas' concurrence to the judge's attention, arguing that it bolsters their claims for dismissing the charges against Trump
* Smith agreed with Trump's legal team that both sides should file more briefing on how the high court's immunity ruling affects the documents case

**Cases of Bias or Opinion:**

* The article does not explicitly state an opinion, but presents a factual summary of the situation and quotes from the briefs filed by Special Counsel Jack Smith
* However, the fact that Trump's lawyers are bringing up a Supreme Court ruling and concurrence to support their arguments for dismissing the charges could be seen as a subtle implication that the courts are somehow biased against Trump

**Favored Political Party:**

* None explicitly stated in this article

**Conclusion:**

This article does not appear to be overtly biased, but presents a factual summary of the situation. However, some readers might interpret the inclusion of Trump's legal team bringing up a Supreme Court ruling and concurrence as a subtle attempt to undermine the legitimacy of the charges against Trump.

Overall, this article can be considered neutral, presenting facts and quotes without explicit opinion or bias.

**Note:** Since there is no obvious political party favored in this article, I would not classify it as biased.

AI analysis made using llama3 running locally.

Original Article:
Special counsel Jack Smith told the judge in the classified documents case in Florida that Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas’ criticism of his appointment should have no bearing on the criminal case against former President Donald Trump.... [Read More]

Published: 2024-07-12T20:45:27







Follow @NPReport


© Nonpartisan Report . All rights reserved.

Privacy | Terms of Use | Opinion/Satire/AI/Disclaimer | Contact Us